Not financial advice. StockIt is for informational and educational use only — not financial advice. Numbers can be delayed, incomplete, or wrong. AI-written interpretation can be biased or mistaken. Always verify against primary sources (filings, the company's investor-relations site) and consider your own situation carefully before making any investment decision.
Tesla, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, leases, and sells electric vehicles, and energy generation and storage systems in the United States, China, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Automotive; and Energy Generation and Storage. The company offers electric vehicles, as well as sells automotive regulatory credits; and non-warranty maintenance services and collision, automotive insurance services, as well as part sales and retail merchandise sale. It also provides sedans and sport utility vehicles through direct and used vehicle sales, a network of Tesla…
⚠ Price has moved +14.5% since this analysis was generated. Multiples and targets below were anchored to $319.69.
1 / 11
Company Overview
Business summary
Tesla designs, develops, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, and energy generation and storage systems globally, with a primary focus on the automotive segment. The company operates in Automotive and Energy Generation and Storage, selling vehicles directly to consumers and offering energy products, automotive regulatory credits, insurance, and maintenance services.
Revenue mix
The Automotive segment dominates revenue, consisting of sedan and sport utility vehicle sales through direct channels and used vehicle sales. The Energy Generation and Storage segment provides energy products and services. Geographic revenue spans the United States, China, and international markets, with significant exposure to volatile regional EV demand.
Competitive position
Tesla holds a leading position in global battery electric vehicle production and market share, though it faces intensifying competition from legacy automakers and EV-focused startups. The company's brand strength and vertical integration in battery manufacturing provide competitive advantages, but prices and margins have compressed as market penetration increases.
Industry trends
The global automotive industry is transitioning toward electrification, driven by regulatory mandates and consumer adoption. Lithium-ion battery costs continue to decline, improving EV economics, while competition in EV segments is accelerating and pricing pressure persists across the sector.
Key competitors
BYD Company LimitedGeneral Motors CompanyFord Motor CompanyVolkswagen AGNIO Inc.
Growth drivers
↗Expansion of EV production capacity in new geographies
↗Energy storage and solar product adoption
↗Autonomous vehicle technology development and commercialization
↗Margin recovery from manufacturing efficiency improvements
Risks
⚠Cyclical automotive demand sensitivity and price competition in key markets
⚠Supply chain disruptions affecting battery and critical materials sourcing
⚠Regulatory changes in EV subsidies and environmental policies
⚠Dependence on Elon Musk's leadership and public perception management
⚠Execution risk on autonomous driving and full self-driving features
2 / 11
Profitability
Tesla posted net income of $3.79 billion on revenue of $97.88 billion over the trailing twelve months, yielding a 3.9% net profit margin and 4.2% operating margin.
Revenue declined 2.9% year-over-year on a trailing twelve-month basis, reflecting softer demand and pricing headwinds in key markets. Gross margin stands at 19.1%, compressed from prior periods as price reductions have outpaced cost reductions. Operating margin of 4.2% reflects operating leverage constraints amid revenue contraction. The company reported earnings per share of $1.11 on a trailing basis, with the most recent reported quarter (1Q26) delivering $0.41 EPS, beating consensus by 17.2%. EBITDA dynamics are obscured by the elevated multiples, suggesting profitability is pressured relative to historical levels.
Versus peers
Tesla's operating margin of 4.2% is below legacy automakers' typical margins (7–12%) but reflects the EV-focused, lower-volume-at-premium strategy. The company maintains higher ROIC and ROAE potential than many traditional automotive players, though current ROE of 4.9% indicates substantial capital efficiency challenges.
Tesla trades at a trailing P/E of 343.75x and forward P/E of 142.72x, both substantially elevated relative to historical norms and peer medians for profitable automotive manufacturers. The P/S multiple of 12.19x and EV/Revenue of 9.66x are premium to traditional auto peers, while the EV/EBITDA of 93.10x reflects minimal near-term earnings power relative to enterprise value. The P/B of 14.27x suggests the market is pricing in significant future asset growth and return expansion, yet current ROE of 4.7% and ROA of 1.9% indicate capital deployment efficiency well below cost of capital. These multiples imply consensus belief in margin recovery and volume acceleration; any shortfall would trigger multiple compression.
Versus peers
Tesla's multiples significantly outpace traditional automotive manufacturers (typically trading at single-digit P/E and P/S below 1x), positioning it closer to high-growth software or semiconductor peers—a comparison challenged by Tesla's capital intensity, cyclical exposure, and slowing top-line growth of -2.9% YoY.
Bull case
+32% to +48% upside if autonomous capabilities materialize, gross margins rebound to 25%+ through manufacturing scale and product mix shift, and full-year deliveries accelerate materially from current run rates.
Base case
-8% to +12% upside reflecting valuation mean reversion balanced against Tesla's brand resilience, energy business diversification, and installed manufacturing capacity; assumes mid-single-digit revenue growth and gross margin stabilization around 20%.
Bear case
-35% to -50% downside if competitive EV adoption outpaces Tesla market share gains, regulatory credits erode further, autonomous vehicle timelines slip beyond 2026, or macro demand deteriorates and pricing pressure intensifies.
4 / 11
Cash Flow
Operating cash flow reached $16.53 billion trailing twelve months, but free cash flow of $5.25 billion reflects elevated capital expenditure required to support manufacturing expansion.
Operating cash flow of $16.53 billion demonstrates the company's ability to convert earnings into cash despite profitability pressures. Free cash flow of $5.25 billion, equivalent to a 5.4% FCF margin on TTM revenue, indicates capital intensity remains high as the company funds gigafactory buildouts and production line upgrades. The gap between operating and free cash flow suggests capex is approximately $11.3 billion annually, critical for supporting future volume growth and technology development. Cash generation provides flexibility for debt service and strategic investments, though sustainability depends on revenue stabilization and margin recovery.
5 / 11
Financial Health
Tesla maintains a strong balance sheet with $44.74 billion in total cash and $15.89 billion in total debt, yielding net cash of approximately $28.85 billion.
The net cash position of roughly $28.85 billion provides substantial financial flexibility and eliminates near-term solvency risk. Total debt of $15.89 billion against total cash of $44.74 billion yields a net cash-to-market-cap ratio of approximately 1.9%, indicating minimal leverage risk. Return on equity of 4.9% and return on assets of 2.2% reflect underutilized capital in relation to the expanded asset base, suggesting equity capital is earning below cost of capital. Debt-to-equity metrics are conservative, and the company faces no imminent refinancing pressure. The balance sheet strength offsets profitability and operational efficiency concerns in the near term.
6 / 11
Forward Signals
Analyst consensus remains constructively biased, but recent earnings miss and guidance uncertainty suggest revisions may be forthcoming.
Consensus rating is buy from 47 analysts with mean price target of USD 425.09 (implying upside from current levels), though the wide spread (low USD 125.00 to high USD 600.00) reflects divergent views on autonomous timing and margin recovery. Next earnings release is scheduled for October 21, 2026. The prior 2Q26 earnings surprise of -38.3% (actual EPS 0.33 vs. estimate 0.535) suggests analyst models embedded overly optimistic margin assumptions; forward guidance visibility appears limited as management navigates demand uncertainty and pricing pressures. Insider ownership of 17.8% indicates aligned incentives, and institutional ownership of 43.6% reflects broad acceptance, but recent stock decline of 14.52% intra-day signals volatility and potential repositioning.
Catalysts
◆3Q26 and 4Q26 earnings: margin trajectory, deliveries, and autonomous vehicle update critical for consensus revision.
◆Autonomous vehicle deployment announcement or regulatory approval; material re-rating catalyst if timing clarified.
◆Energy storage backlog conversion and segment margin realization; high-growth offset to automotive pressure.
◆China competitive dynamics and BYD market share shifts; critical for Tesla's near-term volume and pricing outlook.
◆Macro conditions and auto demand indicators (interest rates, consumer credit, fleet orders).
7 / 11
Technical Analysis
Based on $309.22 · Jul 27, 2026 · Daily chart · News: 8 headlines, Jul 28 – Jul 28
⚠ Price has moved +18.4% since this analysis — levels may be stale.
Short-term · ~1–3 months
downtrendstrong
TSLA shows lower highs and lower lows over the 3-month window (structure label: lower_highs_lower_lows). Price is 19.7% below SMA20 (falling), 22.7% below SMA50 (flat), and has lost 17.8% in three months; the death cross on 2026-04-09 marked the onset of this decline.
Long-term · ~6–24 months
downtrendstrong
The 2-year structure confirms lower_highs_lower_lows. Price is 25.3% below SMA200 (flat), and the 12-month return is +1.3% but masks a severe 6-month decline of -31.1%; the downtrend has dominated since April 2026.
Short-term downtrend is an acceleration of the long-term downtrend; no recovery within the larger downward structure is evident.
Moving averages
MA
Value
Price
Distance
SMA 20
$385.20
below
-19.7%
SMA 50
$399.84
below
-22.7%
SMA 200
$414.09
below
-25.3%
Death cross on 2026-04-09 confirmed the shift from an uptrend to a downtrend; no subsequent golden cross has occurred.
Support levels
$297.82minor
52-week low, just 3.8% below current price; represents the lower boundary of the recent 12-month trading range.
$272.58major
Three touches on record, last on 2025-06-05; established support level tested multiple times in the downtrend.
$213.70major
Four touches on record, last on 2025-04-07; the lowest verified support level in the 252-day window.
Resistance levels
$418.54major
Four touches, last on 2026-03-11; a key resistance cluster near the 52-week high zone.
$411.54major
Three touches, last on 2026-04-17; represents the recent peak before the steep decline.
$381.44minor
Three touches, last on 2026-06-10; intermediate resistance in the current pullback zone.
Patterns
4 of 22 active
↘Descending channel
confirmedhigh confidence
A confirmed descending channel is visible from early June (445 highs) to late July (309 close). Parallel downward-sloping lines contain lower highs and lower lows, with the most recent close near the lower channel boundary, indicating sustained downward momentum.
↘Bear flag
formingmedium confidence
A possible bear flag is visible in late June–early July: a brief rally from late June (~375 to ~425, early July) followed by a downside channel into late July (425 to 309). The pattern suggests a test of lower support, though the flag channel is still developing.
↘Bearish pennant
formingmedium confidence
A possible bearish pennant is forming after the sharp selloff on 2026-07-23 (~319 low). The consolidation from 2026-07-24 to 2026-07-27 (313 to 309) shows tightening volatility, consistent with a pennant setup prior to further downside.
↘Descending triangle
formingmedium confidence
A possible descending triangle is forming: a flat support zone around 297–309 (the 52-week low and recent close) with falling highs from 425 (early July) to 309 (late July). If price breaks below 297, the pattern confirms a downside target.
Technical price target
Horizon: next 6-12 months · medium confidence
Bull case
$381.44 – $434.60
Drivers
Bull case assumes a recovery to the February–March 2026 resistance cluster (381.44, 411.54, 418.54) followed by a rally to the 434.60 level (2 touches in May–July). This range reflects analyst mean target of 401.07 and the upper portion of consensus expectations. Technicals would require a breakout above the descending channel and a reversal of the death cross, supported by volume and positive earnings surprises.
Base case
$309.22 – $381.44
Drivers
Base case assumes consolidation in a 309–381 range, with support at the 52-week low (297.82) and intermediate resistance at 381.44 (3 touches in June). This reflects a stabilization of the current downtrend without a full reversal; price oscillates within the lower portion of the descending channel before any sustained recovery attempt.
Bear case
$213.70 – $309.22
Drivers
Bear case assumes a breakdown of the 297.82 support (52-week low) and a test of the 272.58 (3 touches in June 2025) and ultimate 213.70 levels (4 touches in April 2025). This would require the descending channel to remain intact, falling wedge to resolve downward, and analyst targets to be revised materially lower in response to operational headwinds.
Method: Targets are derived from the confirmed descending channel (June–July 2026), the verified support and resistance levels from the 252-day window, and the analyst consensus mean target (401.07) as a soft cap on the bull case. The bear case extends to prior multi-touch support levels. The wide analyst target range (125–600) and the recent downward revision by Deutsche Bank introduce uncertainty; confidence is medium rather than high due to the absence of a confirmed bullish reversal pattern (no inverse H&S, no double bottom) and the ongoing structure of lower highs and lower lows.
Base midpoint implies -5.7% from the current live price.
RSI(14)
27.3oversold
Volume
Latest volume (43.68M) is 0.99× the 20-day average (44.02M), slightly below average but not diverging sharply; no major volume spike confirms the recent selloff, suggesting some capitulation but not panic liquidation.
Market sentiment
bearish
Analyst consensus remains 'buy' (6 strong-buy, 17 buy, 17 hold), but the mean price target (401.07) is 22.9% above the current price of 309.22, indicating a significant gap between consensus expectations and recent price action. Deutsche Bank cut its target from 465 to 420 on July 28, signaling revisions downward. Short interest is low at 2.0% of float, offering little capitulation signal. Headline sentiment is mixed: some positive catalysts (UK patent win) and analyst conviction on a potential 85% recovery contrast with the headline 'Tesla Continues Its 2026 Crash' and the sharp $1.2T wealth destruction narrative.
News
July 28 headlines are mixed: Tesla has won a UK Supreme Court patent appeal (positive), but 'Tesla Continues Its 2026 Crash' and references to $1.2T wealth loss highlight the severe YTD decline. Coverage is focused on valuation attraction ('Should You Buy After the Dip') and analyst positioning, rather than fundamental operational concerns.
Analyst signal
46 analysts covering TSLA; consensus is 'buy'. Mean target is 401.07, implying 30% upside from 309.22. However, the range is wide (low 125, high 600), and Deutsche Bank's target cut from 465 to 420 on Jul 28 suggests downward revision pressure. The wide range and recent downgrades reflect analyst uncertainty at current price levels.
Positioning
Short interest at 2.0% of float (70.6M shares) with a 1.63-day short ratio indicates minimal short squeezing risk; shorts are not heavily concentrated, and month-over-month trend is not disclosed, limiting capitulation assessment.
Drivers
◆Deutsche Bank target cut from 465 to 520 on Jul 28, signaling downward analyst revisions amid 38% YTD decline.
◆Tesla wins UK Supreme Court appeal in 5G patent case, a minor legal positive not yet reflected in price recovery.
◆$1.2T wealth destruction narrative in July reducing investor risk appetite for speculative megacaps.
◆Post-earnings dip narrative and discussion of valuation attraction suggesting oversold conditions ripe for contrarian entry.
Caution: Analyst consensus remains constructive, but price action and recent target cuts suggest a divergence between Wall Street convictions and market reality. Headline framing emphasizes the crash and wealth loss rather than operational improvements, which may be overstating the bearish case; conversely, the 22.9% gap between mean target and current price suggests significant downside risk if analyst targets themselves are revised lower.
The 52-week low at 297.82 is the most critical near-term support; a breakdown below it would target 272.58 and ultimately 213.70. On the upside, the descending-channel resistance around 381.44–418.54 defines the ceiling for any recovery attempt; a break above 418.54 would signal potential channel reversal.
Bottom line
TSLA is in a confirmed downtrend with lower highs and lower lows across both the 3-month and 2-year structures. RSI is oversold at 27.3, price is 19–25% below all major moving averages, and a death cross on April 9 marked the start of the decline. A descending channel and possible bear flag and bearish pennant are forming, suggesting further downside risk into the 272–297 support zone. Analyst consensus remains 'buy' with a mean target of 401.07, but Deutsche Bank's recent target cut signals downward revision pressure, and the wide divergence between consensus expectations and current price reflects market skepticism. No confirmed bullish reversal pattern is evident; recovery would require a break above 418.54 resistance and a close above the descending channel, neither of which is assured. Oversold RSI and analyst target support could attract short-term buyers, but technical structure remains unfavorable for a sustained rally in the near term.
Prices & news from Yahoo · analysis by claude-haiku-4-5 · cached up to 24h · live drift +18.4%
8 / 11
Earnings Quality
Earnings quality appears reasonable, with strong operating cash flow relative to net income, though regulatory credit sales represent a non-operational revenue stream.
Red flags
⚠Regulatory credit sales (unknown magnitude) inflate reported automotive revenue and margins, masking core profitability of vehicle sales
⚠Revenue declining year-over-year despite production capacity expansion suggests demand softness or pricing pressure rather than operational gains
⚠Elevated capital expenditures relative to free cash flow may inflate near-term earnings if capex cuts materialize
⚠Net income margin of 3.9% is exceptionally thin for a company with the capital intensity and manufacturing footprint Tesla operates, indicating fragile profitability
9 / 11
Competitive Moat
Moderate
Tesla possesses a moderate moat anchored on brand, vertical integration in batteries, and manufacturing scale, though competitive advantages are eroding as rivals industrialize EV production.
Moat sources
Brand strength and consumer loyalty historically provided pricing power, but recent price cuts and market saturation in premium segments have weakened this advantage. Vertical integration into battery cell manufacturing and supply chain control offer cost and supply-chain resilience advantages, particularly given lithium-ion commodity volatility. Manufacturing scale and the legacy of operational improvements position Tesla ahead on per-unit costs, though traditional automakers are rapidly closing this gap through investment and experience. The company's real advantage lies in data collection for autonomous driving and software-over-the-air update capabilities, but commercialization risk remains high. Regulatory credits provided meaningful profit historically, but diminishing reliance and tighter regulations reduce their contribution over time.
10 / 11
Investment Thesis
Neutral
Bull case
Tesla's unmatched manufacturing scale, brand equity, and battery integration create a durable moat; the energy business offers high-margin growth in a secular decarbonization wave. If autonomous driving achieves Level 4+ capability by 2027 and achieves 10%+ attachment rates, return on capital could approach 15%+ and justify a 25–30x forward multiple; energy margins expanding to 30%+ would provide a profitable, capital-light growth engine to offset auto cyclicality. In this scenario, the stock could re-rate substantially upward.
Base case
Tesla sustains global EV leadership but faces structural margin pressure from competition and pricing intensity, stabilizing gross margins around 20% and operating margins near 3–5%. Revenue grows mid-to-high single digits as volume expands in emerging markets and energy products scale; regulatory credits decline. The company remains cash generative with strong free cash flow, but valuation multiple compresses toward 15–20x forward earnings as growth moderates and confidence in autonomous timelines recedes, resulting in sideways to slightly positive returns.
Bear case
Competitive EV adoption and Chinese manufacturer cost advantage erode Tesla's pricing power faster than expected; gross margins compress to 15% or below as a commodity price floor emerges. Autonomous vehicle deployment faces prolonged technical or regulatory setbacks beyond 2026, invalidating the bull case and deflating growth expectations. Energy business remains lower-margin than hoped. Revenue growth flatlines or turns negative; regulatory credit tail winds disappear. Multiple compression from 142x to 30–50x forward P/E drives a -35% to -50% downside.
Reasons to own
✓Unmatched global EV production scale and installed capacity provide structural cost advantage as EV adoption accelerates.
✓Vertical integration in battery supply insulates margins from raw material spot volatility better than non-integrated peers.
✓Energy storage and grid services represent high-growth, high-margin businesses with secular decarbonization tailwinds.
✓Strong balance sheet (USD 43.5B net cash) enables sustained capex, R&D, and shareholder returns without balance-sheet risk.
Biggest risks
⚠Valuation multiples (P/E 343x, EV/EBITDA 93x) leave no margin for error; shortfalls in autonomous progress or margin recovery trigger sharp re-rating.
⚠Recent earnings miss of 38.3% and YoY revenue decline of 2.9% signal demand softness and execution risk; forward guidance visibility weak.
⚠Gross margin of 18.9% is pressured by competition and pricing power erosion; below historical 25% range and vulnerable to further compression.
⚠Regulatory credit revenue expected to decline; currently a material earnings contributor as core auto margins compress.
⚠Macro cyclicality: consumer discretionary auto demand highly sensitive to credit conditions, interest rates, and recession risk.
Metrics to watch
●Gross margin trend by region and product; stabilization above 20% or breakdown below 18% is critical valuation signal.
●Energy storage revenue growth rate and operating margin; key to offsetting auto margin compression.
●Free cash flow per share (currently USD 4.71B FCF on USD 103.6B revenue, ~4.5% conversion); sustainability amid capex and competition.
●Global EV market share and volume growth versus BYD and legacy OEMs; price realization trends in key markets.
Bottom line
Tesla is a world-class operator in a structural growth industry with a moderate but eroding moat, but current valuation (343x trailing P/E, 142.7x forward P/E) prices in near-perfect execution on autonomous vehicles, energy margin expansion, and sustained EV demand leadership. At current levels, risk/reward is skewed toward disappointment; the stock offers attractive long-term optionality for patient investors with high conviction in autonomous timelines, but near-term catalysts (earnings revisions, macro sensitivity, competitive intensity) suggest meaningful downside if expectations slip.
11 / 11
Leadership
The leadership team is anchored by founder and CEO Elon Musk, supported by finance, manufacturing, engineering, and design executives. The team includes long-tenured operational leaders and subject-matter experts in vehicle engineering and design, reflecting a mix of technical depth and functional specialization.
Mr. Elon R. Musk
Co-Founder, Technoking of Tesla, CEO & Director
Age
54
Serves as Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Tesla since inception
Holds the titular position of Technoking, reflecting dual focus on technology and strategy
Age 54 as of fiscal year 2025
Primary driver of product strategy, manufacturing ambition, and public-facing communications
Also leads SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company, dividing attention across multiple ventures
Mr. Vaibhav Taneja
Chief Financial Officer
Age
47
Total pay
$403K
Age 47 as of fiscal year 2025, born 1978
Holds CFO position with oversight of financial planning, investor relations, and capital allocation
Total compensation of approximately $403,000 in fiscal 2025, reflecting base salary and benefits
Responsible for financial statement management and disclosure compliance
Mr. Xiaotong Zhu
Senior Vice President of APAC & Global Vehicle Manufacturing
Age
45
Total pay
$376K
Age 45 as of fiscal year 2025, born 1980
Leads Asia-Pacific regional operations and global vehicle manufacturing strategy
Total compensation of approximately $376,322 in fiscal 2025
Oversees manufacturing footprint across multiple gigafactories and production efficiency
Mr. John Walker
Vice President of Sales - North America
Age
62
Total pay
$122K
Age 62 as of fiscal year 2025, born 1963
Leads North American sales organization and direct-to-consumer channel strategy
Total compensation of approximately $121,550 in fiscal 2025
AI Snapshot
⚠Informational only
claude-haiku-4-5 · Generated 2mo ago · based on $313.03
Live$366.20▲+8.12(+2.27%)
Tesla designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, and provides energy generation and storage systems globally. Today's session appears to be driven by a research firm lowering its price target while maintaining a positive stance, combined with reported challenges surrounding the Cybertruck's market reception and recent developments in the CEO's personal financial situation.
⚠Not financial advice. StockIt is for informational and educational use only — not financial advice. Numbers can be delayed, incomplete, or wrong. AI-written interpretation can be biased or mistaken. Always verify against primary sources (filings, the company's investor-relations site) and consider your own situation carefully before making any investment decision.